With international sports events now becoming one of the biggest draw-cards for television content directors, we have had the opportunity to be exposed to many national anthems on a regular basis. An anthem is typically a musical piece written as a response to some cause or call. Derived from Greek and Saxon words, the anthem has a place in religious events as well.
Anthems are often emotional expressions if intent, devotion and promise and prayer. In many instances, anthems are seen as tools to engender and unite people around a common cause or country, after wars, or struggles for example. Anthems come from the souls and the hearts of people only when they truly believe in what is being sung.
I thus find it difficult to contend with the modern trend of mixing several languages in one anthem. Unless you understand the language that you are using, how can you feel the emotions stirring in you from the context that comes with language, how can you be truly absorbed in the emotions? I understand that these modern anthems are attempts at consolidation of nations and cultures, but they fail to my mind, because they are compromises. Such a compromise is at best a reminder of something that could have been. I am sure that there will be many comments about my position, and that will be great. However, my idea here is to get to another position, that of the anthem of our souls.
I this piece, my aim is to consider what I call the anthem of the soul. For this, we need to go back to the roots of the word. The dictionary on my MacBook says that an anthem is a rousing or uplifting song, sung antiphonally (from the Saxon antefn and Latin antiphona, and originally from Greek, which indicates an “opposite voice” - or in answer to something). In church, the antiphon was usually sung in response to a psalm, or other part of liturgy. Gregorian chant is an example of the original form.
These chants and songs are devised in a way that makes the words and/or the emotions clear. It responds to a call, a higher voice. In some of my previous pieces on this blog I spoke about how the lack of playfulness, rushing around and an absence of hope whittle us down to nothingness. Our souls are dumbed down by constant insistence by those around us to deliver something, to do things now or to be accountable for even more things. We are brought up to listen closely to the voices of parents and peers, teachers and politicians, and those that can muster the loudest call. We are swamped by the messages and calls on television, radio and the other forms of media, including the internet.
We become deaf to the higher calling in our lives. We stray from the path we are intended to take, our own voices start to fail us, and our language becomes garbled. Where is the energy and belief that fire the devotion to our true role on this planet? It is swamped by the noise and our response to our life’s calling turns into a whisper. In an attempt to compromise, our personal anthem becomes just a reflection of the demands of those shouting us down. We answer in their voices, slowly disappearing as a unique voice. Our souls blend into nothingness, our value diminishes to zero.
We have no anthem left, no rousing song to take us through the day, no way to show our good intent, or to rise to the occasion when we are called to do those things that lift us as humans above the other animals. How can we care for our planet, for the frogs being poisoned, for the birds being pushed out of their habitats, if we have no soul that responds with an uplifting burst of song?
We all need to go back and ferret in the corners of our souls for the song we need to sing to the world. Each one of us must retrain our voice to sing in our own language, with crystal clarity about our call, our intent and our promises to the universe around us. We must not hide behind circumstances or the past. Write a book, draw something, sing the song you always wanted others to hear, play the piano, walk the dog, teach someone something you have mastered, learn from a friend, wave goodbye to old enemies, respond with energy to a sunrise. In fact, do none of the above! I echo Popper, who urged his students to listen closely to what he had to say, if only to be able to dismiss it and to replace it with their own original ideas.
Just bring your anthem to the liturgy of life.
The image above is from my personal library and my not be used without written consent. It is a recent photograph at a wine farm called “Anthem” in New Zealand. This piece is dedicated to my best friend and her quest to sing her anthem as her soul wants and her Creator wishes.
19 October 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Tweets
Places I've Been
- Create your own travel map or travel blog
- Great vacation rentals at TripAdvisor
2 comments:
Jan, an interesting view. A few comments in response, as promised, to parts of what you've written.
(1) Have you read Viktor Frankl? Your statement - "ferret[ing] in the corners of our souls..." etc. - reminded me of Frankl's claim that conscience is the only vehicle through which we, humans, detect meaning in life. Frankl claims that people find meaning because to be human is to have a transcendental dimension / side that permits you to search for meaning. There is no division between being human and find meaning. I sense similarity in your views and his.
(2) On the matter of national anthems and sporting events, which you discuss near the top of the piece, the first thing that sprang to mind was the Romans' use of panem et circenses (bread and circuses). Anthems, for me, are a bit like those crusty Roman breadrolls ;) Not for a moment do I think national anthems are neutral ingredients in a commercial television broadcast mix. So, yes, an anthem is a musical piece -- delivered (mostly) by good singers and musicians, and at considerable volume (which, importantly, has direct physiological effects on the sense organs and the brain... with consequences for how we interpret that sensation) -- expressing some sort of intent, as you suggest, but I think it is more than a tool of patriotism or a rallying cry to a noble cause. It is a tool to unite people in a common consumerism. Sing your heart out but never forget that contemporary sports is a money-making machine. That makes me far more concerned about the persistent use of anthems at sporting events. It functions to degenerate the experience into snot en trane and a Springbok jersey costing R500. Sing loudly, well, and your team will play better. And then everybody's happy, not so? Well, they should be, they bought the jersey, didn't they? That's the commercial logic.
(3) A final comment I want to make is about the arbitrary nature of language and meaning. De Saussure, way back in the days before TV and cappuccinos, told us that there is an arbitrary relationship between sign and signified. So, for example, the phrase "my country" is composed of entirely arbitrary signs (e.g. "c", "m", "t", etc.). In Afrikaans and in Hebrew, different words and letters are used, and no language is the true language capturing the perfect essence of "my country". We forget that, choosing to invest so much emotion and energy into what is an entirely arbitrary relationship between words and meanings, especially in songs and anthems. So, to sing the national anthem with passion relies on someone assuming that singing loudly these words (e.g. "to live and die for freedom in South Africa, dear land"), actually carries a sort of cosmic significance. Semiotics and test rugby results teach us that they don't.
Anyway...
Read Frankl; I think you will like his books.
Indeed, the use of anthems at sporting events are now just utility to a wider concoction of emotional blackmail. I have not read Frankl, will have to now. De Saussure's views: well, let's put it this way, I tend not to see putting ideas down in symbols to be different from vocalising them. Sounds, scribbles, whatever, these are all ways to signal expression (from my perspective). Love your comments!!
Post a Comment