Alan Watts, a Zen student (I guess he would forgive me for calling him a student), says: “Just as the highest and the lowest notes are equally inaudible, so, perhaps, are the greatest sense and the greatest nonsense equally unintelligible.”
This is the distinct feeling I get when reading about and listening to the explanations of complexity and emergence. Some would have me believe that we can design for a specific emerging property, whilst others would have it that true emergence must be surprising. This duality arises, it seems, from the inability we have to untangle highly connected things. This is absolutely no good when we try to make sense of our world today. As a scientist of this age, I am perturbed by our inability to come to grips with these things. It is as if the path has arrived at too many forks all at once, as if time is howling around us, like a vicious wind, dragging us towards a catastrophic end. In mathematical terms, it seems as if we have arrived at one of those points on a logistic map where everything suddenly become chaotic, where the slightest change in the dynamics around us, ramps the whole system to another level of unpredictable behaviour. The end of certainty, for sure, Prof Prigogine!
Our divide and conquer approaches seem to fail us when we try to make sense of the xenophobia in our country, for example. Some of us quickly look for other theories, like a mysterious third force, that is driving the killing of people all over the place. Some blame it, predictably, on the past. Whatever the driving force, we cannot seem to analyze the problem down to its constituent levers, ready to be pushed and pulled into a new and better configuration. We assume (realistically) that poverty is normal in a society of free traders, but sometimes something skews the system and poverty becomes an overriding feature of a society. Worse, the gap between the poorest and the richest becomes massive. The worst case scenario is when those rich few are actually also those in charge of the society and were voted into that position by the poorest people in an attempt to escape the poverty. Again, it sounds simple, maybe too simple. One step further, and we can imagine these rulers using their positions to “direct” the society to believe certain things, to distract them from the reality of their miserable existence, or to direct them towards sinister goals to preserve their power base. This has got nothing to do with xenophobia, but it makes for a very nice cover.
Shown below is the very deterministic equation to generate a logistic map, and below it the map showing the bifurcation forks and the high density of possible states of the system to the right.
If we are somehow in such a chaotic state, what equations are driving our state, where do we go next, or will the system have to explode or implode necessarily before we can have relative stability again? Is this what revolutions are all about? Was our “managed” revolution to come from Apartheid to democracy just a fork in the road where both choices actually lead to disaster? Or was this path chosen even before Apartheid? Was it chosen maybe a couple of thousand years ago? I cannot imagine that it is possible to know the answer, but I am willing to bet that it is also not as simple as blaming it on the history of the past 1000 years or the past 50 years or just to blame it on poverty alone.
Photo from iStockPhoto.com (licensed to Jan Roodt - do not copy this image)